I realize you will probably steal arguments from these cases and theory blocks. I had a penchant for running arguments that tend to be applicable to most topics, so many of the arguments posted here have the potential to be useful in the future. However, I would caution you that the vast majority of the blips in these cases are underdeveloped precisely because I understood the context and implications of my arguments in a much fuller, more sophisticated way than the text of those arguments expressed, and could develop and explain them to judges/opponents. If you steal my arguments you won't have any such advantage. In this vein, it is important to bear in mind that there is absolutely no substitute for spending time reading books and articles on philosophy if you want to become a good framework debater. Email me at cwspence12@mail.strakejesuit.org for reading suggestions/questions/comments. Good luck!

NC_Discourse Ethics.docx
K_PublicPrivate.docx (unbroken)
AT-contingent standards suck.docx
AT-Skep Affirms.doc